Who's Online

We have 139 guests online

Login Form

Random Republican

Rod_Paige.jpg

Illinois Debt Baby

 
Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Apr 27
2010

Should the GOP Candidate for Assessor Withdraw in Favor of Claypool?

Posted by: Rumblings

Tagged in: Untagged 

Rumblings


The entry of Forrest Claypool into the race for Cook County Assessor as an Independent against Democrat Joe Berrios has many Republicans seeing a unique opportunity to take out a bulwark of the Democratic Machine’s cash flow.   

It is difficult to underestimate the importance of Cook County property tax appeals to the stream of contributions received by top Democrats every year.   Recall recent news articles on Speaker Mike Madigan, and how he has obtained major property tax reductions for large clients, like the Sears Tower.   Senate President John Cullerton also runs a lucrative law practice in – guess what? – property tax appeals!   Republican turncoat State Rep. Paul Froehlich has been caught red handed seeking political donations and campaign assistance from constituents for whom he obtained property tax reductions.   

What is the common nexus to all this?  Joe Berrios.  Berrios has been sitting on (and controlling) the three-member Cook County Board of Review, the administrative body that rules on property tax protests and appeals.  Berrios is also the Chairman of the Cook County Democratic Party.   

Who has been sitting on the Board of Review doling out those property tax reductions to clients of Madigan and Cullerton?  Joe Berrios.

Who has been sitting on the Board of Review while constituents of newly turned Democrat Paul Froehlich achieved an unheard of 90% plus success rate in their tax appeals?  Joe Berrios.

Now Joe Berrios wants to be the Assessor, allowing him to "arrange things" even before they hit the Board of Review.

Of course, the hopeful and the grateful all speak through political contributions.  Joe Berrios’ various committees currently have something over $1 million in cash.  Many find it hard to believe that he amassed so much cash with just a winning smile. Mike Madigan is sitting on close to $2 million in his committee.  John Cullerton is a mere piker by comparison, but managed to raise $750,000 in the six months ending 12/31/09. 

The Cook GOP has nominated Sharon Strobeck-Eckersall.  Ms. Strobeck–Eckersall is actually very qualified for the position of Cook County Assessor, having served for several years as Township Assessor in Evanston, and holding licenses as a real estate appraiser and real estate broker.   We can’t say how much money she has raised so far, since she has not filed a committee organization statement with the Illinois State Board of Elections.  Since a committee must file once it raises $3,000, we can assume there is not too much in the kitty as of yet.

The real issue is that Ms. Strobeck-Eckersall hasn’t a chance against Berrios, but Claypool does.   While Claypool is neither a Republican nor a choir boy, having served as Daley’s Chief of Staff while the rigged hiring was going on down the hall, he has a solid recent record as a reformer.  Plus, Berrios is not running for re-election to the Board of Review, so if he loses the Assessor race he is out of government, a huge loss to the Democrats.  Ms. Strobeck-Eckersall is quite correct that the two Democrats will “split the vote”, but in 2006 a good Republican Candidate, Ralph Conner, received only 19.6% of the vote countywide.  The Democrats can split their vote with room to spare.

There is another unpleasant fact.  Many “Republican” Committeemen, from both the City and the suburbs, are either allied with, beholden to, or on very good terms with Joe Berrios.  These Committeemen are not going to lift a finger for Ms. Strobeck-Eckersall.  In fact, a few can be counted on to actively work hard for a Berrios victory.    

Many are therefore wondering if having Ms. Strobeck-Eckersall withdraw to clear the field for Mr. Claypool is not the best move.  An opportunity to defeat a figure like Joe Berrios in a key post like Assessor should not be brushed aside for appearances sake.

Hits: 915
Comments (25)Add Comment
Rumblings
...
written by Rumblings, April 27, 2010
Dear Mr. Know it All Jenkins:

All you are seeing is your personal agenda. There are other considerations.
David Jenkins
...
written by David Jenkins, April 27, 2010
Rumblings,

You can pay Claypool's taxes since you like him so much. The 7% cap is more Socialist than any other law in Illinois that I know of, and you suggest the GOP candidate should withdraw for the benefit of a person whose whole campaign is the very doctrine that re-distributes the taxpayer burden from property to the next?

Go read a book or something. Try my site (below).

Where all the General Assembly research has been read, by yours truly, and posted for the benefit of those who actually care about what issues are at stake in this election.

Come back when you know something.

Corruption vs. Marxism? Some choice.

Cordially,

David

http://www.watchdogjenkins.org...html#more
0
...
written by Ned Flanders, April 27, 2010
Excellent idea. Actually, I have already decided to vote for Claypool myself.

If the GOP can shut off the funding to the machine, the machine will whither on the vine.

The Feds shut down the patronage armies, now a big chunk of the money flows. If Berrios is defeated, Chicago is one massive coronary infarction from freedom.
David Jenkins
...
written by David Jenkins, April 27, 2010
Rumblings,

My "agenda" is called Capitalism. And my property tax issue is just a damn good example of the disparity; which is why I continue to exploit it. You'll find that I've spent thousands more fighting this than what it's costing me.

And what is your agenda? To put in a lifelong Democrat posing as an Independent because you read more bad press about Berrios than Houlihan. It's called opportunism, and it's a short-term way of looking at things; just because Berrios is running for office.

I can't think of a single instance of corruption, graft, or misdeed, other than Berrios's alliance with Madigan, that Houlihan hasn't taken part in as well.

The 7% cap is THE campaign issue of choice by Claypool and company, and it's completely relevant that I refute what you're saying when you obviously don't know what this is.

Cordially,

David

P.S. I don't "know it all"; just the 7% cap which you don't. Sorry for reading.
0
...
written by Mr. Conservativo, April 27, 2010
Joe Berrios is the single most corrupt official in Illinois.
Tom Swiss
...
written by Tom Swiss, April 27, 2010
Maureen Murphy came into Skoien's office to demand the GOP run no one against Berrios. She slammed her fist down on the desk several times and said I was f'ing everying up.

It was a completely surreal moment. At the time, I couldn't figure out how it was in the best interest of the Republican party to NOT run someone against Berrios.

I later found out, Berrios helped her get her BOR seat. Berrios figured the district was still Republican so it was best to own one.
Rumblings
...
written by Rumblings, April 27, 2010
Jenkins, all you see is your issue, as if that is the only thing in town. It is not.
0
...
written by Huh? , April 27, 2010
Interesting idea, but the Powers That Be will never have the guts to do it.
David Jenkins
...
written by David Jenkins, April 27, 2010
Rumblings,

You're not refuting me on the facts. Just making generalizations. And this idea that simple corruption is worse than Socialism is, in my opinion, insane.

And if you are accusing me of having a limited point of view, then I'd recommend the following:

1. You can pay my taxes.
2. Back that statement up with something.

I'm taking on alot of projects right now, and I'm going after alot of people for different reasons.

In fact, I was more than happy to spend 100% of my time going after Madigan before this Claypool thing errupted. But, alas, it's my responsiblity to open this up if you don't have the skills to do so...

Sorry...

Cordially,

David
Rumblings
...
written by Rumblings, April 27, 2010
OK, ok, you humbly admit that you are God's free, but under appreciated gift to the people of Cook County on any question affecting property taxes, we get it. But this is about removing a mjor Democratic figure from power, not just taxes.
0
...
written by Ned Flanders, April 27, 2010
WITHDRAW NOW STROBEK-ECKERSOLL!!!
0
...
written by Ned Flanders, April 27, 2010


This would be the best strategy for the GOP.
David Jenkins
...
written by David Jenkins, April 27, 2010
Rumblings,

I never said any of that. And I really don't have time for your emotional reaction to my criticism of your "piece." Instead, I'd ask that we keep it to the facts.

And you're proposing that we remove a "major Democratic figure from power, not just taxes"....?

I want to make sure I've got this right. You want to remove Cook County Democratic Party Chairman, Joseph Berrios, from political office to replace him with Forrest Claypool, Mayor Daley's former Chief of Staff and companion to Senate Candidate No. 5 Jesse Jackson, Jr. This is what you're proposing?

And what happens when Joseph Berrios, who now has 3.5 (minus whatever he spends in this election) million in his campaign fund, and alot of time on his hands after being kicked out? Does he go away? Or does he spend more time lobbying and being Chairman?

And what if people aren't happy with Claypool's assessment practies, and he retires like Houlihan, just like they're not happy now?

And then with the 7% "cap" component; let's say Claypool has four years now as Assessor to work with legislators to get this re-installed...?

Ned Flanders,

If you're going to poke fun at Eckersall, at least spell her name right.

Cordially,

David
Rumblings
...
written by Rumblings, April 27, 2010
Jenkins, where the hell do you think he got the $3.5 million, fool? A winning lottery ticket, perhaps?
David Jenkins
...
written by David Jenkins, April 27, 2010
Rumblings,

No. He got it from the same group of property tax lawyers, developers, real estate companies, and public unions that put Houlihan in office.

Do you really not see that this thing goes farther than Berrios and Madigan...? Or are you just choosing to see what you want?

I don't disagree with the Berrios and Madigan allegations. I'm just opening up the side of the story you're not telling.

And as far as Claypool's contributions, that has yet to be seen. His current campaign fund isn't very deep.

Cordially,

David
0
...
written by Mary Andersen, April 27, 2010
I would love to see Berrios get beat, but there is something to be said about having Republicans on the ballot. I think she should stay. She might win, who knows?
0
...
written by Brady Quinn, April 27, 2010
She might win, who knows?


Unless she has big bucks, she should get out. Otherwise, there is no chance in hell. And innocent sounding blather like "there is something to be said about having Republicans on the ballot" is just naive and dumb.

Politics revolves around money. We need to shut off the money to the corrupt Dems.

Grow up Mary.
David Jenkins
...
written by David Jenkins, April 27, 2010
Brady Quinn,

The only reason politicians need money is because, even in the Information Age, they still need to spend to get exposure.

Why? Because of lazy voters like you, who don't keep up on current events, issues, and read more books...but, of course, you watch those silly 30-second advertisements. Don't you...?

Cordially,

David
0
...
written by Brady Quinn, April 27, 2010
What makes you think I am uninformed? I bet I know more than you. How pompous!
0
...
written by Ray Bliss, April 27, 2010
David,

You can blast Brady as uninformed if you want, and you can lament the low quality of political discourse, but the bottom line is this: if voters wanted more than sound bites, they'd demand it. But they don't. So get off your high horse acting like you're going to save the world. You can't win if you don't play, and money will always matter. It doesn't matter if Brady wants to informed or not, it will always cost money to contact voters. Don't act like you're somehow going eliminate the importance I'd money in politics.
0
...
written by Ray Bliss, April 27, 2010
I apologize for all the typos. I'm on my phone.
0
...
written by Ned Flanders, April 27, 2010
Brady by at least 6%. Strobel should get out of the hizzo.
David Jenkins
...
written by David Jenkins, April 27, 2010
Brady Quinn,

Know more than me? Sure. I could care less. Whatever. This isn't a competition. Pompous. You bet.

In the meanwhile, present something evidenciary to the conversation. Pointing out that I'm not a nice guy isn't exactly accomplishing anything. That "secret" has been "out" for awhile.

Ray Bliss,

I think you'd be surprised what voters would demand if they were given more than 30-second soundbites. Or even better, websites like this - where people who go who want more information than what they're given on NBC-5 at 10:00PM - could do more than re-reporting all the stuff that everyone already knows. Like Berrios is bad news. He's been bad news for more than 20 years. And suddenly he's villified by the press only in the last year because people like me have been demanding it.

Funny thing - I am demanding better coverage. I do it every single day. And instead of sending letters to Andrew Herrman and Pam Zekman, you're arguing with me on this blog.

And all my content is 100% original, though I borrow and credit other sources, musicians, etc. when I use their stuff.

Cordially,

David
0
...
written by Ray Bliss, April 28, 2010
David,

All I'm saying is that you shouldn't be surprise when you're the only kne demanding more. Unfortunately, elections are not decided by people like you or me. They are decided by voters who only want soundbites and simplification. If you want to change minds you have to understand that you are not the average voter. Swing voters don't have time (won't make the time) to read your blog. Converting your message into soundbites is the only way you'll get the less engaged voters to care. You cannot convince them to engage. They won't.
David Jenkins
...
written by David Jenkins, April 28, 2010
Ray Bliss,

Now these are the conversations I love having with people. And your points are eloquently stated and fantasticlly delivered; more importantly, you're right.

But one of us doesn't have to be wrong for the other, or both of us, to be correct. And while you've successfully identified a real political problem; I would counter it with this: I think that, although what you said is true, people do have a way of distinguishing the spirit of real reform and revolution from parties who offer compromise and conformity.

I'm far from that point; but that is my goal. To show what real reform can be. And in my lifetime, I feel that I've won alot of battles people have told me I couldn't win (none of them political, lest I bore you with personal stuff). But to just make things simple: I'm a fighter. And I'm willing to fight, win or lose.

You don't have to agree with me on anything, but please agree with me on this: you can do whatever the hell you want to in this life because that's what democracy and freedom are all about. These guys don't have superpowers. Hell, most of 'em aren't even all that bright.

You really don't think they can be beaten? And the only way to take down Berrios is to side with Pat Quinn and Daley's former Chief-of-Staff? Those aren't real choices and you know it.

Cordially,

David

Write comment

busy

Latest Comments

Disclaimer

Volunteer

Join

Chicago Corruption

Chicago Republicans © All Rights Reserved
Templates by Shack  Templates
chap