Who's Online

We have 190 guests online

Login Form

Random Republican

kathy_ireland1.jpg

Illinois Debt Baby

 
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
Jan 09
2012

Ultimate Business Jet User by Larry Nazimek

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase

The following Letter to the Editor appeared on pages 10-11 of the Sept., 2011, edition of "Business & Commercial Aviation."  It may have also appeared elsewhere, since it was submitted to several aviation publications, some of which expressed interest.


President Barack Obama demonizes those who fly on business jets, as though it was the ultimate in luxury.  The fact of the matter is that these jets enable executives to conduct company business more expeditiously.  If they use the jets for personal business (such as a trip to a resort for a weekend), or if a family member, not connected with the company, accompanies them on a business trip, the value of the trip must be reported as income for tax purposes.  Some companies may even require some type of reimbursement for the cost of the flight.

When the president flies on Air Force One to conduct the business of the nation, he is using it for the purpose for which it was intended.  Unfortunately, presidents have grown accustomed to treating the aircraft as a perk of the office.  Obama flies to various cities for political fund-raisers, with the amount of money raised far surpassed by the cost of the flight (plus the cost of security, meals, accommodations, etc.), and the taxpayers pick up the tab.  When he flew to Chicago to celebrate his 50th birthday, the taxpayers also paid for it.

When Obama uses Air Force One, the ultimate business jet, for non-government business, he should report it as income on his tax return, and he should reimburse our financially strapped government.  This of course, would put him into bankruptcy.

Aug 23
2011

Chicago is bike-friendly, but it’s unfriendly to cars by Larry Nazimek

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase
The following letter to the editor appeared in the Chicago Sun-Times, 8-1-11, page 21, along with the color photo:
 
 

Chicago is bike-friendly, but it’s unfriendly to cars

July 31, 2011 7:02PM

Story Image

Traffic moves eastbound along the new bike path on Kinzie St. between Orleans and Wells during morning rush hour Thursday, June 23, 2011. | Ernie Torres~Sun-Times

Updated: August 6, 2011 12:02AM



 

I am both a bike rider and a car driver.

 

As a biker, I enjoy the exclusive use of bike lanes, though I am far outnumbered by drivers. For this, I pay nothing. I can ride as fast as I can pedal, and congestion is seldom a problem.

 

As a driver, I get exclusive use of only Lake Shore Drive and the expressways. I share the rest of the streets with bikers. In Chicago, traffic is often congested, and the congestion is only getting worse.

 

City officials want to make travel even slower by making some lanes narrower and offering little or no space for drivers to go around those who are waiting to make a left turn.

 

For this I pay in high gas taxes, a driver’s license, license plate, city sticker, the highest parking meter rates in the U.S., parking tickets, towing fees, red light camera tickets, etc.

 

Chicago is the most bike-friendly city in the United States. It is probably the most car-unfriendly city, too.

 

Larry E. Nazimek,

Logan Square

 

 

It also appeared in the Chicago Tribune a week later, 8-8-11, page 33:

 

chicagotribune.com

Voice of the People, Monday, August 8, 2011

August 8, 2011
 
Road unfairness
 
I am both a biker and a car driver.
 
As a biker, I enjoy the exclusive use (i.e., where cars can't drive) of bike lanes, even though I am far outnumbered by drivers. For this, I pay nothing. I can ride as fast as I can pedal, and congestion is seldom a problem.
 
As a driver, I get exclusive use of only Lake Shore Drive and the expressways. I share the rest of the streets with bikers. In Chicago, traffic is often congested, and the congestion is only increasing. Chicago Department of Transportation officials want to make travel even slower than it already is by making some of the lanes narrower and offering little, if any, space for drivers to go around those who are waiting to make a left turn.
 
For this I pay in high gas taxes, a driver's license, license plate (an annual sticker), city sticker, the highest parking meter rates in the U. S., parking tickets, towing fees, red-light camera tickets, etc.
 
I agree that Chicago is the most bike-friendly city in the U. S., but it is probably the most car-unfriendly city too.
 
— Larry E. Nazimek, Chicago
 
 
Two days later, there was a follow-up letter:
 

chicagotribune.com

Unsafe cyclists

4:35 PM CDT, August 10, 2011
 
Advertisement

Good for letter writer Larry Nazimek. My feelings are the same. I have biked the lakefront since the 60s and have always been lucky to be close to it until recently. Now I take my bike over in my pickup, then bike. I always knew the streets belonged to the cars, and I gave them the right of way. Nowadays bikers believe the roads belong to them, and you had better look out. The way they weave in and out of traffic I am surprised there aren't more killed like the lady downtown was.

Bikers don't stop for stop signs or red lights. If they do stop, they try to balance the bike without putting their feet down.

We pay all the fees and taxes, and cyclists don't even need a license plate.

-- Bob Egan, Chicago

Copyright © 2011, Chicago Tribune



Which party speaks for the drivers?  Certainly not the Democrats.   They hit drivers with one fee/fine after another, and the amount of these fees/fines keeps increasing.  Fighting these fees, fines, and of course, the parking meters, would draw many people to our side, and it would show them which party really looks out for them.  So far, we've been passing up this golden opportunity.

Jul 11
2011

Irony of Anthony Weiner's Dilemma by Larry Nazimek

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase
I submitted the following letter to the editor to the local papers, but none published it:

What former Cong. Anthony Weiner did, and his earlier attempts to cover it up, were reprehensible and conduct unbecoming a congressman.  As he has admitted, public officials are held to a higher standard than the general population.
 
What is ironic, however, are the (current and retired) Democratic senators and congressmen who called for his resignation, but who previously stood by (then) President Bill Clinton, after his affair with Monica Lewinsky and his attempts to cover them up.  There is a difference between having an illicit affair in person and sending lewd messages.  In addition, the President should be held to the very highest standard.
May 17
2011

Daley Should Pay His Way - Letter to the Editor, 5-10-11 by Larry Nazimek

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase
The following letter to the editor appeared in the Chicago Sun-Times, May 11, 2011, page 26, and the Chicago Tribune, May 10, 2011: 


Daley should pay his way
  

Mayor Richard M. Daley has grown so accustomed to living a life of luxury, at our expense, that he feels entitled to it, even after he gives up the throne.  

Daley has never had to pay the outrageously expensive parking meters/boxes or be concerned with parking tickets, red-light cameras or gas prices, though he can well afford them.  

If he wants limousine service, he should pay for it himself, or have his buddies at Chicago Parking Meters pay for it.  

Larry E. Nazimek 
 

Some of you are probably wondering why I didn't also say that while Daley wants to deny Chicagoans the right to defend themselves with firearms, that he expects us to pay for his security (i. e., have Chicago police officers guarding him).  I would have included this, but someone already did.

Feb 24
2011

Tell Pat Quinn How to Save Money by Larry Nazimek

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase

Gov. Pat Quinn seems to know how to raise taxes, but as all Illinois Republicans know, he should be focusing on reducing spending and saving money.  Unfortunately, he does not know how to do this.

Fortunately, he is smart enough to ask for our help (but whether he is smart enough to follow it is another matter).

The following solicitation for suggestions is from his electronic newsletter:


Save Our State Money

Do you have an idea that could save the state of Illinois money? Residents of Illinois can win $50 to $5,000 for successful suggestions submitted to the State Government Suggestion Award Board. Each suggestion is presented to the award board and, if feasible, original and cost-saving, may be eligible for an award. Awards are based on the savings each idea generates. For more information about this initiative you can visit their website or call (217) 558-0964.


If you click on the link, you get to the page that explains their suggestion program:http://www.state.il.us/cms/2_servicese_oth/sesabrd.htm

You should submit your suggestion on their form: http://www.state.il.us/cms/download/pdfs/sgsab_form.pdf

After you complete the form, I suggest that you print and/or save your work, just to be on the safe side, before clicking on the Submit by Email button.

We all have ideas on how to cut back on wasteful government spending, so here is your chance to tell Gov. Quinn.

Obviously, whether or not he takes our advice is quite a different matter.

Feb 14
2011

Ode to Mayor Richard M. Daley

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase
As the Daley Regime is coming to an end (finally), many people are heaping accolades on him, choosing to ignore all of the things he has done to make life and business in Chicago more deplorable.
 
I got to thinking about how Daley could do or say anything he wanted, the people be damned, because he knew all along that he would win reelection.  He knew that nobody was holding him accountable.  He knew that he could stay in the Mayor's Office, because his army of patronage workers would get out the vote for him.  His arrogance, in this regard, has been overwhelming.
 
This prompted me to write this little bit of poetry.  The way it should be performed is to have a group of people, at least 3, with one person saying the verses, while everyone says the "chorus" lines.  You could either have one person reciting all the verses, or you could have the group members step forward to take turns.  What is important is that you keep up a beat.  If you try it a few times, I think you'll agree.
 
I'm sure that many of you will have ideas for changes and/or additional verses, but for what it's worth, just enjoy.  Perhaps you will see fit to perform this piece and post it on You Tube.
 
Let's hope that this does not offend Mr. Daley, but he is, after all, a public figure, subject to criticism. 
 
 

                           

            VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

 

 

There's a riot happening in the street.

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

The kids can't read - or write their names.

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

 

Businesses are leaving left and right,

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

But it doesn't matter, because they didn't

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

 

My car fell into a big pot hole, but

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

The streets by his house, well they're just fine, so

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

 

The city's finances are in the red, but

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

Vote early and often, even if you're dead.

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

 

Illegal conversions and overcrowded blocks

VOTE FOR MAYOR DALEY!!!

Dec 30
2010

Able-bodied Welfare Recipients Should Perform Snow Removal Duty by Larry Nazimek

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase
Governmental entities can only do so much snow removal with the equipment and personnel available.  Sometimes, this is not enough.
 
It would make sense to require that able-bodied welfare recipients be used for shoveling snow as a condition to receiving their welfare checks.  Not all of them would be needed at any one given time, and there are many winter days when there is no snow to shovel, so none would be needed.
 
The solution would be to require them to make themselves available just as citizens must make themselves available for jury duty.  Under this arrangement, people would be notified as to when they would have to make themselves available.  They would be required to call in the day prior to the day when they are scheduled for this duty, and they would be told if/when/where to report.
 
Some people consider this to be "slavery," but I disagree.  Slavery is when one person works while another person reaps (some or all of) the benefits without the consent of the person doing the work.  When you work, you pay taxes, and without your consent, some of these taxes are paid to welfare recipients who are not working, so the "slave" is the one working and paying the taxes.
Dec 08
2010

Republicans Should Propose Changes to Healthcare - Organ Transplantation by Larry Nazimek

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase
When it comes to health care, it has been said that the GOP is the "Party of No," because all of the proposals have been coming from the Democrats, while the Republicans have been opposing them, without proposing very much as an alternative.

I am not advocating that we make proposals simply for the sake of making proposals, but when it comes to allocating donor organs for recipients, there is much room for improvement.
 
Let's assume that you have signed on to be an organ donor, i. e., you have agreed that when you die, that you want your organs to be harvested for transplant purposes.  After all, you won't need them any longer, so they should be used to save some other person(s)'s life.
 
Now let's suppose that you have a medical problem, and your doctors determine that you need a donor organ.  You are put on a waiting list (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network) operated by UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing). 
 
Your position on the waiting list depends on several factors, but your status as an organ donor is, curiously enough, not one of them, and that is unfair.  About half of the transplanted organs go to those who had not signed on.  It's like getting a rebate without having purchased the product. 
 
Due to the shortage of people who have signed on to be organ donors, you may very well die waiting for one.  Dr. Robert Strata, former head of UNOS, referred to the list as a "Waiting to Die List."
 
Those who have signed on to be organ donors should get preference over those who haven't.  One way of doing this would be to create two subsets of the waiting list, with the A List being those who had signed on to be organ donors, and the B List being those who had not.  No organs would go to those on the B List unless nobody on the A List needed them.
 
There are those who feel that your status as an organ donor should not be taken into account in determining your place on that waiting list, and that it's best to "...let the doctors decide."  The principle of "From each according to his ability; to each according to his need," is about as old as Karl Marx and the Democratic Party. 
 
Several years ago, I spoke with (then) State Rep. (now State Sen.) William Delgado, at his annual health fair, about the problem, and he asked me to draft a proposed bill so that he could introduce it.  I did this, but when he consulted with Secy. of State Jesse White, White talked him out of it.  They are worried that if the legislation were to pass, that some poor people might not know about the program, and that they might miss out on getting an organ.
 
Secy. of State Jesse White certainly does a good job of getting the word out on the need for people to sign on as organ donors.  The only problem is that he is appealing to "altruism," i. e., doing it because it is the right thing to do, but as experience shows, while many people are signing on, many are not.  If the people were told that by not signing on to be an organ donor, that their chances of getting an organ, if they ever needed one, would be greatly diminished, they would surely sign on.  Therefore, the net effect of giving organ donors preference would cause the list of donors to significantly increase.
 
Another idea that would help alleviate the shortage of organ donors would be to change the system from an "opt in" system to a "presumed consent" system,  where people would be free to "opt out."  In other words, when you open an account at a bank, or you get a credit card, it is presumed that you consent to having your personal information shared, unless you opt out.  When it comes to organ donation, however, it is presumed that you do not want your organs donated, unless you "opt in."  Many people today are too lazy and indifferent to opt in, so under presumed consent, laziness and indifference would mean that they would be organ donors.
 
To give you an idea as to just how bad the shortage of donor organs is, consider the following: 
 
Over 6,500 Americans die every year while on the waiting list for a life-saving transplant -- one every 80 minutes.
Over 109,000 people are on the waiting list right now.
Over 50,000 more people will join the waiting list this year -- one every 10 minutes.
The waiting list is growing 5 times as fast as the rate of organ donation.
Over 50% of the people who need an organ will die before they get one.
(http://www.lifesharers.org/whyjoin.aspx)
 
Any legislator or candidate interested in proposing legislation on this issue can contact me for assistance and further information.
 
In the meantime, anyone interested in improving his chances of getting a donor organ, in the event he would ever need one, can join LifeSharers, of which I am a member.   Members agree that upon their death, that they want their organs to go to the most suitable LifeSharers member who needs them.  If no member needs them, then they go to whoever would have received them, anyway, in the absense of LifeSharers.  It costs nothing to join: https://www.lifesharers.org/enroll.aspx.  To learn more about LifeSharers: www.lifesharers.org.
 
Nov 29
2010

Let's Establish a Richard M. Daley Award by Larry Nazimek

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase
Many of us remember Sen. William Proxmire's (D-WI) Golden Fleece Awards.  He established the award in 1975 for public officials who wasted our tax dollars. 
 
There is nothing unusual about a politician accusing other politicians of wasting money.  On the contrary, it is very common.  The fact that Proxmire put such accusations in the form of this award, however, drew nationwide publicity. 
 
It was recently announced that there would be a Mayor Richard M. Daley Legacy Award for Global Leadership in Creating Sustainable Cities.  It was established by the U. S. Green Building Council, who decided to award the first one to Daley. 
 
Perhaps it's time that the Chicago Republican Party establish an annual Richard M. Daley Award for Proficiency in Machine Politics or some other category. 
 
Once Daley is out of office, he may be held in high regard by many.  If his people continue to hold office, he will probably be regarded as a saint, or at least a highly respected elder statesman. 
 
Many consider him to be a very popular mayor.  He, and his cohorts, point to his high vote percentages in recent elections, but if that made him popular, then consider that the last time Saddam Hussein ran for election, he got 95% of the vote!  Based on this, one might conclude that Hussein was even more "popular" than Daley.  When I saw the statue of this "popular" politician crash to the pavement, I had renewed hope that I would live to see the end of the Daley regime, and next year, that will happen. 
 
If we were to announce a Daley Award, it would, if nothing else, draw some media attention to the fact that there is such a thing as a Republican Party in Chicago.
 
Nov 24
2010

Recent Election Results by Larry Nazimek

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase
There have been many analyses as to why we didn't do better, and it's possible that all of them are at least partially correct. 
 
There is, however, one point that is not peculiar to this election, or any  particular election, but is a trait of the electoral process.
 
Perhaps a good way to describe our electoral process is to consider a candidate who steps in front of a large group of people.  If he says, "Elect me, and I will confiscate the wealth of the richest 10% and redistribute it to the other 90%," he stands a good chance of winning.  This example may to be a bit too extreme, so let's just say that our Democratic candidate proposes to give more services, benefits, and programs to the whole group, but to send the bills to the wealthiest 10%. 
 
In our Democracy, it's one person = one vote.  (We're not considering voter fraud in this simple discussion.)
 
If you own stock in a company, you get proxy statements prior to the company's meeting of shareholders, where you get to vote on issues that will be discussed at the meeting.  You get one vote per share.  This is a fair way of doing things, because those with the largest stake in the company should have the greatest say in how the company is run.  They are the ones who have the most to gain (if things go well and the company prospers) as well as the most to lose (if the company recklessly spends itself down the drain).
 
This is not to say that those who hold a relatively small amount of shares do not have a say in how the issues are decided.  Any shareholder may submit proposals.  Some dissident groups sometimes buy a few shares just so that they can speak out against company policy at the meetings.  They may say that the company is polluting the environment, supporting dictators in banana republics, shipping arms to countries they don't like, etc. 
 
Nevertheless, after they are heard, when it comes to the voting, those with the greatest stake in the company have the greatest say in deciding the issues.
 
If the situation were different, with one shareholder getting one vote, if enough people on a bloc would buy one share, they could control the company.  They could vote that the company's assets be sold and that the treasury be equally distributed to each shareholder.   Once the company no longer had anything in its treasury, it would effectively cease to exist.  After all, the company would not have the power to print money, like the government does.  In addition, the company could not require that the shareholders cough up more money, particularly in proportion to the number of shares they held.
 
In our democracy, it's to the benefit of the Democrats to legalize and register as many illegal aliens and poverty-stricken people as they can, because it increases the number of voters who will side with them in increasing spending on things that the wealthier minority will have to pay for.
 
We have seen many demonstrations and other protests by those who want more spending, but we rarely see demonstrations that demand higher taxes.  We have, however, recently seen this very sort of thing.  Those who demanded higher taxes, however, weren't demanding that their taxes increase.  They were demanding that the taxes of the wealthier people increase.  They want to buy things, but they want to send the bills from their spending sprees to others.
 
We can't do anything to change the voting system to allow those paying the bills to get more votes per person than those who don't pay them.  What we can, and must, do, however, is to keep illegal aliens off the voter rolls.
Nov 22
2010

Stop Preaching to the Choir and Get the Word Out by Larry Nazimek

Posted by tvmdcrhase in Untagged 

tvmdcrhase

This is my first blog for this site.  I generally don't write blogs, because they amount to "preaching to the choir."  I do, however, write letters to the editor, and have had many published, because those are seen by many people.
 
In this instance, however, I am writing this blog, because it is intended for "us" and not the rest of Chicago.
 
I have read many well written entries on this site, but they should have been directed to all Chicago voters, and not simply to those who already agree that the Democrats are going in the wrong direction.
 
One of the benefits of a two party system is that each party holds the other accountable.  On the national level, when Obama, or other Democratic leaders, say or do something, there are Republicans to refute them.  It may be a Senator, Congressman, Governor, or Party Chairman, but there is a Republican response.
 
On the State level, Tom Cross, the State Chairman, or someone else, replies.
 
On the County level, Tony Peraica or Lee Roupas are interviewed.
 
On the City level, however, Daley says and does whatever he wants, but where is the Republican response?  
In my neighborhood, there have been instances during primaries where people ask me who I am voting for.  When I tell them, their response is often, "But he's a Republican," as if to say that I can only choose from among the Democratic candidates.  When I reply, "So am I," they may cross their two index fingers and laugh, as if fending off a vampire.  
I can't say I blame them, because they have only been exposed to one point of view.  In any dictatorship, only one point of view is heard, and in the Daley regime, things are no different.
 
We can't expect the media to come to us; we must go to them.  A political organization usually puts out press releases and position papers to the media on a frequent basis, and we should do the same. This does not mean that all of them will get a story on the news, but some will.  
While we must represent locally, the National, Illinois, and Cook County Republican Parties, we must also represent the Chicago Republican Party.  If we don't, who will?
 
While press releases and position papers are an important facet of getting the word out, we must not pass up opportunities that may present themselves.  If we are in some city event where Daley is speaking, the media may interview random members of the crowd to get their reaction.  If, however, one of us is present, and wearing a distinctive Republican necktie or shirt, that may increase the possibility that we will be interviewed.
 
One way or another, the Chicago Republican viewpoint must be heard.  We must preach to all Chicagoans,and not merely to those who already agree with us.

Latest Comments

Disclaimer

Volunteer

Join

Chicago Corruption

Chicago Republicans © All Rights Reserved
Templates by Shack  Templates
chap